Samples of the very best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Samples of the very best abstracts submitted into the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an campaign that is aggressive gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs when it comes to Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an district that is indian. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to revive self-government and control over land and resources represents a”recover that is significant of space.” Equally significant is what happened once that space was recovered.

The main topic of this paper addresses an understudied and essential period in the real history associated with Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a body that is growing of in the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks as the Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the fight to regain legit the parsonage he occupied, its resources, and the community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power in the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse as well as the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking community identity that is mashpee. This study examines reports that are legislative petitions, letters, and legal documents to make a narrative of Native agency when you look at the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation therefore the Evolving Community Identity in the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to Public Places: Local Actors therefore the Creation of National Parklands when you look at the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and organizations that are non-governmental the creation of parklands through the American South. An investigation of parklands in the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation while current historiography primarily credits the federal government with the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the importance of local and non-government sources when it comes to preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the importance of a bureaucracy that is national the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but focus on opposition towards the imposition of the latest rules governing land when confronted with some threat that is outside. The importance of local individuals in the creation of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history in spite of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative. Several examples when you look at the American South raise concerns concerning the traditional narrative pitting governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained curiosity about both nature preservation plus in creating spaces for public recreation at the local level, and finds that the “private road to public parks” merits investigation that is further.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks into the American South” was subsequently selected for publication into the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced an abundant literature in regards to the Levellers and their role in the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily centered on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and political thought. Typically, their push to give the espousal and franchise of a theory of popular sovereignty has been central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a fragmented sect of millenarian radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility that they could make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to find a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their ideas that are religious. In the place of centering on John Lilburne, often taken due to the fact public face regarding the Leveller movement, this paper will focus on the equally intriguing and a lot more consistent thinker, William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement into the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, I hope to suggest that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism in the face of violent sectarians who sought to wield control over the Church of England. Even though Levellers were ultimately suppressed, Walwyn’s commitment to a tolerant society and a secular state should not be minimized but instead recognized as section of a bigger debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper aims to contribute to the rich historiography of religious toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: A Case Study regarding the First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have never only proliferated rapidly–they have grown to be the normative expectation within American society. For the vast majority of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have lead to no permanent memory sites therefore the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the community in addition to nation could your investment tragedy and move on. This all changed on May 29, 1989 when the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial towards the thirteen people killed in the infamous “post office shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the situation of Edmond in order to realize why it became the memory that is first of the kind in United States history. I argue that the tiny town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities at the time associated with shooting, in conjunction with the near total community involvement established ideal conditions for the emergence of the unique type of memory site. I also conduct a historiography associated with usage of “the ribbon” to be able to illustrate how it offers become the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society into the late century that is 20th. Lastly, I illustrate the way the lack that is notable of between people involved in the Edmond and Oklahoma City cases following the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity among these cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising number of aesthetic similarities that these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The Quest for Postmortem Identity during the Pax Romana”

“should you want to know who i will be, the clear answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription. The Romans dealt with death in lots of ways which incorporated a variety of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as with the case regarding the “ash and embers.” The romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence of the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained by the turn of the first century of this era. Cremation vanished by the 3rd century, replaced by the practice of the distant past because of the century that is fifth. Burial first began to take hold within the western Roman Empire through the early second century, with all the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites through the Roman world would not talk about the practices of cremation and burial in detail. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in as a type of burial vessels such as for instance urns and sarcophagi represented the only real location to move to investigate the transitional to inhumation in the world that is roman. This paper analyzed a small corpus of such vessels so that you can identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns among these symbols to your fragments of text available relating to death in the world that is roman. The analysis determined that the transition to inhumantion was a movement brought on by an elevated desire on the right part of Romans to preserve identity in death during and after the Pax Romana.